Is There a Link Between Processed Foods and Autism?

Making wise decisions before the birth of their child is made possible for parents by being aware of the potential connection between PPA and autism. It also reveals crucial information about the relationship between gut health and brain function. Just keep in mind that PPA occurs naturally in the body and that only excessive amounts could disrupt normal brain development.

The brain cells known as neurons are responsible for sending mental signals to the body. On their journey from the brain to the area of the body they control, neurons are supposed to be supported and protected by glial cells.

Studies have revealed a higher level of PPA in stool samples from children with autism, according to Naser. Could too much of this acid harm a developing fetus and cause autism?

However, when the ratios are off, glial cells hinder rather than support neurons. The pathways that neurons must travel on are obstructed and congested by an excess of glial cells. Increasingly fewer neurons struggle to navigate along condensed routes. Due to this, autistic children exhibit behaviors like repetitive behavior and difficulty interacting with others. Also discovered in autistic children is brain inflammation brought on by an overabundance of glial cells.

A new study suggests that processed food consumption during pregnancy and autism may be related. Dr. University of Central Florida researcher Selah Naser has looked into how an acid added to packaged foods affects fetal brain development. He believes that this acid may contribute to autism.

Only a very low level of iron may increase the risk of ASD, according to the few studies on the subject (DeVilbiss et al. , 2017; Wiegersma et al. , 2019). However, there is insufficient research on the relationship between iron, vitamin B12, calcium, magnesium, and broader dietary practices and ASD; as a result, these factors need additional research to support preliminary findings.

With promising results for maternal folate and vitamin D as potential protective factors and emerging evidence for associations with other nutrients, research on maternal diet and ASD has accelerated recently. Pregnancy-related dietary changes by the mother may have an impact on both an individual’s and a population’s susceptibility to ASD-related disability. Further investigation in this area is required to not only resolve any contradictions that may exist and thoroughly consider timing and dose, but also to broaden the list of nutrients that are taken into account for associations with ASD, use more thorough methods to address combined effects, look into underlying mechanisms, and explore associations with ASD severity, comorbidity, and phenotypic subgroups. Given the fact that many women of childbearing age have nutrient deficiencies or consume food in suboptimal amounts (Bird, Murphy, Ciappio, , 2011; Oken et al. , 2003) holds great promise for the investigation of maternal diet as a potential modifiable risk factor for ASD.

As mentioned, the majority of research looking at any one prenatal nutrient in relation to ASD has concentrated on folate. This work was largely inspired by early reports of protective associations between prenatal vitamin use and ASD, for which studies were generally consistent. The use of multivitamins and ASD was then the subject of several larger studies that used prospective register data as well as focused folic acid supplementation and folate biomarker studies. The results of these more recent studies, however, were not all consistent, with a number of null studies and even reports of an increased risk with higher folate.

Results from the studies on the supplementation of folate and folic acid thus indicate that, while protective associations have been replicated, there is also some degree of conflicting information. Such discrepancies may be due to differences in folate measurement. All studies relying on folate biomarkers have reported null associations, whereas the majority of studies relying on self-reported folic acid supplementation (at 800, 600, or 400 g) support an inverse association between folic acid and ASD. The fact that these biomarkers were measured outside of the periconceptional period’s presumed critical window raises questions about the temporal variability of folate biomarkers and the need to investigate links to folate levels earlier in pregnancy. Although not always consistent, the majority of the null studies were carried out outside the US, suggesting a potential influence of fortification practices and regional diet as another potential source of discrepancies. Additionally, a number of studies indicating protective associations also had large sample sizes and prospective data, indicating that discrepancies are not solely caused by statistical power or reporting biases. However, several studies reporting null associations had larger sample sizes than most of the positive association studies. When results from different studies were compared according to the outcome definition, studies examining the relationship between ASD-related traits and diagnosis were more likely to report null results than those examining the former. There are no clear differences between the studies’ results with regard to the timing of outcome assessment.

Even though research on maternal diet and ASD has only recently started, it is expanding quickly and has offered some evidence for the significance of a number of nutrients. The potential role of folate/folic acid has received the most attention, and several replicated findings are in favor of a protective association. The findings of this review also provided some tentative evidence in favor of a protective relationship between vitamin D and ASD. Evidence was less consistent for PUFAs. Other prenatal nutrients, such as iron, vitamin B12, calcium, and magnesium, lack sufficient evidence. However, some studies also found evidence for increases in risk with lower levels. Of all the studies that were found, the majority reported reductions in risk of ASD with higher or sufficient nutrient levels.

What do doctors recommend about prenatal diet to reduce the risk of Autism?

To ensure the best possible outcomes for their unborn child, all pregnant women should pay attention to their diet during pregnancy. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists provides pregnant women with some wise recommendations regarding the nutrients they should be consuming through their diets and supplements.

7 tips for preventing autism during pregnancy

Leave a Comment